with the goal of pulling them away from the EU.” It also advocates for supporting parties and movements that seek sovereignty and preservation or restoration of traditional European ways of life, all while remaining pro-American.
By focusing on a few nations instead of broader relationships, the strategy appears to prioritize like-minded political movements. This approach is based on the premise that these countries face “civilizational erasure” due to immigration policies and censorship of free speech. The aim is to foster closer ties with governments and intellectual figures who align with American principles.
The C5: A New Global Power Structure
President Trump’s national security strategy goes beyond merely criticizing the Group of Seven (G7) by proposing a new body called the “Core 5” or C5. This includes the U.S., China, Russia, India, and Japan – countries with over 100 million people each. The C5 would meet regularly for summits focused on specific themes, with its first agenda item being Middle East security.
This new structure aims to address global issues by creating a more flexible group of major powers.
Unlike the G7, which requires wealth and democratic governance, the C5 allows for diverse members that may not fit traditional criteria but are significant in their own right. The strategy views this as a way to maintain American influence while navigating complex international relations.
Acknowledging American Hegemony’s Failure
The full NSS also addresses the failure of American hegemony, a term not present in the publicly released version. It states that “Hegemony is the wrong thing to want and it wasn’t achievable.” This shift reflects a broader strategy to reduce America’s global dominance through soft power while still maintaining influence.
According to the document, after the Cold War, American foreign policy elites convinced themselves that permanent domination of the world was in their best interests. However, this has proven unattainable.
The strategy suggests partnering with regional champions to maintain stability, acknowledging that no single country should be responsible for global issues alone.
The Trump administration’s approach is clearly outlined in a detailed and nuanced manner, reflecting its commitment to changing global dynamics through new alliances and structures. However, the White House has denied any alternative versions of the National Security Strategy, emphasizing transparency and adherence to one official document.
